How the globalism con game leads to a ‘new world order’

When globalists speak publicly about a “new world order” they are speaking about something very specific and rather sacred in their little cult of elitism. It is not simply the notion that civilization shifts or changes abruptly on its own; rather, it is their name for a directed and engineered vision — a world built according to their rules, not a world that evolved naturally according to necessity.

There are other names for this engineered vision, including the “global economic reset,” or the more general and innocuous term “globalism,” but the intention is the same. The ultimate goal of the new world order as an ideology is total centralization of economic and governmental power into the hands of a select and unaccountable bureaucracy made up of international financiers. This is governance according the the dictates of Plato’s Republic; a delusional fantasy world in which benevolent philosopher kings, supposedly smarter and more objective than the rest of us, rule from on high with scientific precision and wisdom. It is a world where administrators become gods.

Such precision and objectivity within human systems is not possible, of course. Human beings are far too susceptible to their own biases and personal desires to be given totalitarian power over others. The results will always be destruction and disaster. Then, add to this the fact that the kinds of people who often pursue such power are predominantly narcissistic sociopaths and psychopaths. If a governmental structure of high level centralization is allowed to form, it opens a door for these mentally and spiritually broken people to play out their twisted motives on a global stage.

It is important to remember that sociopaths are prone to fabricating all kinds of high minded ideals to provide cover for their actions. That is to say, they will adopt a host of seemingly noble causes to rationalize their scramble for power, but in the end these “humanitarians” only care about imposing their will on as many people as possible and feeding off them for as long as time allows.

There are many false promises, misrepresentations and fraudulent conceptions surrounding the narrative of globalism. Some of them are rather clever and subversive and are difficult to pick out in the deliberately created fog. The schemes involved in implementing globalism are designed to confuse the masses with crisis until they end up asking for more centralization and less freedom.

Let’s examine some of the most common propaganda methods and arguments behind the push for globalization and a “new world order”…

Con #1: Globalism is about “free markets”

A common pro-globalism meme is the idea that globalization is not really centralization, but decentralization. This plays primarily to the economic side of global governance, which in my view is the most important because without economic centralization political centralization is not possible.

Free markets according to Adam Smith, a pioneer of the philosophy, are supposed to provide open paths for anyone with superior ideas and ingenuity to pursue those ideas without interference from government or government aided institutions. What we have today under globalism are not free markets. Instead, globalism has supplied unfettered power to international corporations which cannot exist without government charter and government financial aid.

The corporate model is completely counter to Adam Smith’s original premise of free market trade. Large corporations receive unfair legal protection under limited liability as well as outright legislative protection from civil consequences (Monsanto is a perfect example of this).  They also receive immense taxpayer funded welfare through bailouts and other sources when they fail to manage their business responsibly.  All this while small businesses and entrepreneurs are impeded at every turn by taxation and legal obstacles.

In terms of international trade being “free trade,” this is not really the case either. Only massive corporations supported by governments are able to exploit the advantages of international manufacturing and labor sources in a way that ensures long term success. Meanwhile economic models that promote true decentralization and localism become impractical because real competition is never allowed. The world has not enjoyed free markets in at least a century. What we have today is something entirely different.

Con #2: Globalism is about a “multipolar world”

This is a relatively new disinformation tactic that I attribute directly to the success of the liberty movement and alternative economists. As the public becomes more educated on the dangers of economic centralization and more specifically the dangers of central banks, the globalists are attempting to shift the narrative to muddy the waters.

For example, the liberty movement has railed against the existence of the Federal Reserve and fiat dollar hegemony to the point that our information campaign has been breaking into mainstream thought. The problem is that globalism is not about the dollar, U.S. hegemony or the so-called “deep state,” which in my view is a distraction from the bigger issue at hand.

The fact is, globalist institutions and central banks permeate almost every corner of the world. Russia and China are just as heavily tied to the IMF and the Bank for International Settlements and international financial centers like Goldman Sachs as any western nation.

Part of the plan for the new world order, as has been openly admitted by globalists and globalist publications, is the decline of the U.S. and the dollar system to make way for one world financial governance through the IMF as well as the Special Drawing Rights basket as a mechanism for the world reserve currency. The globalists want a less dominant U.S. and a more involved East, while the East continues to call for more control of the global economy by the IMF. This concept unfortunately flies over the heads of most economists, even in the liberty movement.

So, the great lie being promoted now is that the fall of the U.S. and the dollar is a “good thing” because it will result in “decentralization,” a “multi-polar” world order and the “death” of globalism. However, what is really happening is that as the U.S. falls globalist edifices like the IMF and the BIS rise. Globalists have pulled a bait and switch in order to trick the liberty movement into supporting the success of the East (which is actually also globalist controlled) and a philosophy which basically amounts to a re-branding of the new world order as some kind of decentralized paradise.

Con #3: Nationalism is the source of war, and globalism will end it

If there’s one thing globalists have a love/hate relationship with, it’s humanity’s natural tribal instincts. On the one hand, they like tribalism because in some cases tribalism can be turned into zealotry, and zealots are easy to exploit and manipulate. Wars between nations (tribes) can be instigated if the tribal instinct is weighted with artificial fears and threats.

On the other hand, tribalism lends itself to natural decentralization of societies because tribalism in its best form is the development of many groups organized around a variety of ideas and principles. This makes the establishment of a “one world ideology” very difficult, if not impossible. The first inclination of human beings is to discriminate against ideas and people they see as destructive and counter to their prosperity. Globalists therefore have to convince a majority of people that the very tribalism that has fueled our social evolution and some of the greatest ideas in history is actually the source of our eventual doom.

Nationalism served the globalists to a point, but now they need to get rid of it entirely. This requires considerable crisis blamed on nationalism and “populist” ideals. Engineered war, whether kinetic or economic, is the best method to scapegoat tribalism. Every tragedy from now on must eventually be attributed to ideas of separation and logical discrimination against negative ideologies. The solution of globalism will then be offered, and a one world ideology in which all separation is deemed “evil.”

Con #4: Globalism is natural and inevitable

As mentioned earlier, globalists cannot have their “new world order” unless they can convince the masses to ask for it. Trying to implement such a system by force alone would end in failure, because revolution is the natural end result of tyranny. Therefore, the new world order has to be introduced as if it had been formed by coincidence or by providence. Any hint that the public is being conned into accepting global centralization would trigger widespread resistance.

This is why globalism is always presented in the mainstream media as a natural extension of civilization’s higher achievement. Even though it was the dangerous interdependency of globalism that  helped fuel the economic crisis of 2008 and continues to escalate that crisis to this day, more globalism is continually promoted as the solution to the problem. It is spoken of with reverence in mainstream economic publications and political discussions. It receives almost religious praise in the halls of academia. Globalism is socioeconomic ambrosia — the food of the gods. It is the fountain of youth. It is a new Eden.

Obviously, this adoration for globalism is nonsense. There is no evidence whatsoever that globalism is a positive force for humanity, let alone a natural one. There is far more evidence that globalism is a poisonous ideology that can only ever gain a foothold through trickery and through false flags.

We live in an era that represents an ultimate crossroads for civilization; a time of great uncertainty. Will we seek truth in the trials we face, and thus the ability to create our own solutions, or will we take a seemingly easier road by embracing whatever solutions are handed to us by the establishment? Make no mistake — the globalists already have a solution prepackaged for use. They have been acclimating and conditioning the public to accept it for decades now. That solution will not bring what it promises. It will not bring peace, but eternal war. It will not bring togetherness, but isolation. It will not bring understanding, but ignorance.

When globalists eventually try to sell us on a full-blown new world order, they will pull out every conceivable image of heaven on Earth, but they will do this only after creating a tangible and ever present hell.

— Brandon Smith

The post How the globalism con game leads to a ‘new world order’ appeared first on Personal Liberty®.


Mass shooters and madness

When Travis Reinking walked into the Nashville-area Waffle House in the predawn hours of Sunday morning, he was naked, except for a green jacket which he left at the scene after hero James Shaw, Jr. disarmed him. I mention Reinking’s bizarre apparel choice because it indicates the single most important factor in his crime, and the similar crimes committed in from Florida to California and back, madness. Not just his madness, but the madness of our societal response, or lack thereof.

Reinking, who as of this writing is still on the lam in his birthday suit, isn’t mildly unbalanced; he’s practically a walking Doors lyric. A naked guy who shoots up a Waffle House is hardly a new resident of crazy town. And given his recent sit downs with not only local, but state and federal law enforcement, he didn’t move there in secret. Reinking is the same rabid squirrel who got arrested last summer after trying to muscle his way past the Secret Service and into the White House. After that fool’s errand, he spent some quality time with the FBI, who then passed him off to the Tazewell County, Illinois, Sheriff’s Department. They, in turn, revoked his firearm license and confiscated his weapons before turning him over to his father. And his father gave him back the guns.

In order to open fire in the Waffle House, Reinking strolled past multiple laws, multiple law enforcement officers and a parent/guardian who obviously wavered between “disinterested” and “criminally negligent.” Two agencies of the Federal government had him, on at least one occasion, within shooting distance of the Oval Office. The locals in the Land of Lincoln, where gun laws are among the most restrictive in the nation, handed Travis’s weapons back to his old man, who handed them back to his son.

An individual known to be not only mentally ill, but violently so, strolled past every roadblock — short of outright national confiscation — we’ve been told to believe will stop horrors like the one which unfolded near Nashville. And for those of you who might respond by saying nationwide confiscation is the answer, I would point you east. Good luck telling the victims of the Bataclan theater massacre that they’re not dead, not to mention the hundreds of victims of monsters who reacted to gun bans by arming up with blades, bombs and box trucks to slaughter their victims.

Just like the attacks in Parkland, Charleston, Aurora and Columbine, the legal apparatus in place to keep guys like Travis Reinking, Dylann Roof, James Holmes, Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold from unleashing their inner demons on the rest of us failed at every level. It’s worth noting that the same legal apparatus — including some of the same agencies — also failed in their charge to prevent attacks like the ones in Orlando, San Bernardino, Fort Hood and Boston, among others. Whether the assailant has been radicalized by his imam or his imagination is as immaterial as the weapon they use to carry out their wishes. The real weapon each and every one of these killers has is the squirming mass between their ears. Until we address them, we’re wasting time and lives.

— Ben Crystal

The post Mass shooters and madness appeared first on Personal Liberty®.


State Department drops ‘occupied’ from West Bank description



For years, the international community and the U.S. government have described the West Bank in Israel as “occupied.”

That is, governed by Israel even though Palestinians claim ownership.

But just days ago, the U.S. State Department discontinued that description.

The agency’s new “Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2017, released Friday, assesses human rights in nearly 200 countries and territories.

“These reports are required by U.S. law and are used by a variety of actors including the U.S. Congress, the executive branch, and the judicial branch as a factual resource for decision making in matters ranging from assistance to asylum,” the department said.

“Israel is not just another nation,” says WND Founder Joseph Farah. Find out why in “70 YEARS: Israel’s Prophetic Past, Present and Future.”

There still is a reference to the “Israel-occupied Golan Heights,” but that same description for the West Bank has been dropped.

Liberty Counsel, a longtime advocate of Israel, noted that instead of the headline “Israel and the Occupied Territories,” this year’s report titles it “Israel, Golan Heights, West Bank and Gaza.”

Last December, the U.S. ambassador to Israel, David Friedman, asked the State Department to stop calling the West Bank “occupied.”

The move comes amid preparations to move the U.S. Embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. The announcement in December of U.S. recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital enraged Palestinian interests, but a number of nations have followed Trump’s lead.

Liberty Counsel pointed out the report contains a new note about the status of Jerusalem.

It states that “issues primarily related to Israeli residents of Jerusalem are covered in the ‘Israel and the Golan Heights’ section. It is the position of the United States that the specific boundaries of Israeli sovereignty in Jerusalem are subject to final status negotiations between the parties.’”

Mat Staver, founder of Liberty Counsel, president of Christians in Defense of Israel and president of Covenant Journey, said it’s about time that the State Department stopped referring to land in Israel as “occupied territories.”

“I applaud the Trump administration for this welcome change. The media often uses terms like ‘occupied territories’ and ‘refugee camps’ to delegitimize Israel,” he said. “Most people hearing the words ‘refugee camp’ visualize a makeshift tent city, when in reality these places are established neighborhoods with businesses and schools. I am pleased the State Department has eliminated the derogatory and false term ‘occupied territories’ language.”

Get involved in the Thank Trump Campaign, and thank the president for one, or many, of the things he’s already accomplished.

The report notes that one of the most significant human rights issues is “terrorist attacks targeting civilians.”

“According to the government and media reports, during the year terrorist attacks killed seven persons and injured 23 others. The locations of attacks included Jerusalem, Yavne, Petah Tikva, Tel Aviv, and Arad. Most of the attackers were Palestinians from the West Bank, and two were Arab citizens of Israel,” the report says.

Liberty Counsel said the contents of the report otherwise remained very much the same as in previous reports.



Ex-President George H.W. Bush in intensive care

(CNN) — Former President George H.W. Bush, who just buried his wife first lady Barbara Bush on Saturday, is in intensive care, CNN has learned.

“President Bush was admitted to the Houston Methodist Hospital yesterday morning after contracting an infection that spread to his blood. He is responding to treatments and appears to be recovering. We will issue additional updates as events warrant,” spokesman Jim McGrath said in a statement.

Bush was admitted to the hospital on Sunday morning with an infection that led to sepsis, which can be life-threatening, according to a source close to the former President. He was in critical condition, the source said.


DNC lawsuit may bring its secret servers within GOP reach

Russian President Vladimir Putin and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton

Russian President Vladimir Putin and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton

A Washington lawyer has dispatched a letter to the Democrat National Committee instructing its members to preserve their computer servers, their memos, their communications, and much more – because he may want to be reviewing them.

The DNC famously refused to let investigators examine its computer servers when it claimed somebody hacked their way in and stole all sorts of emails during the 2016 presidential election.

Those emails were released by WikiLeaks and became a hot button topic during the presidential race and after, with the DNC claiming that it was Russia, in collusion with the Trump campaign, that violated their computer.

Last week, the DNC sued Russia, the Trump campaign and many others for that alleged infringement.

But now comes word from a lawyer for one of the defendants that he might be wanting to explore the DNC servers, communications and more.

And it could be that he might have the right, through the court process of discovery.

Robert Buschel, a lawyer for former Trump campaign ally Roger Stone, said in his message to the DNC that its databases, records and even servers need to be preserved for inspection.

“We intend to test the basic underlying claims that ‘Russians’ hacked, stole, and disseminated DNC data, rather than the various other plausible scenarios, including internal theft,” Buschel told the DNC.

Stone is one of the defendants in the DNC case.

The whole issue has multiple rabbit trails. There’s the issue of Hillary Clinton’s use of a private and unsecured server for her classified emails as secretary of State for Barack Obama. There are the claims that Russia hacked the DNC. There’s the still-unsolved issue of the murder of Seth Rich in Washington, who has been accused by some interested parties of being the DNC insider who took emails and turned them over.

Tom Perez, chief of the DNC, claimed over the weekend that he’s seen a “mountain of evidence of collusion between the campaign and the Russians to basically effect our democracy and so we did our homework and we brought our civil case.”

Special Counsel Robert Mueller has been investigating that very issue for the last year or so, and has been unable to come up with any charges, or even any evidence, so far.

The president took to social media to comment.

“So funny, the Democrats have sued the Republicans for Winning. Now he R’s counter and force them to turn over a treasure trove of material, including Servers and Emails!” Trump posted.

The DNC simply refused to allow the FBI to inspect its hacked servers. It says it repaired or rebuilt dozens of computers and servers.

The complaint said a private company, CrowdStrike, and the U.S.government determined the DNC servers were hacked by two separate state sponsored Russian adversaries.

Buschel said, “We sent the preservation and hold letter because we want to know if the DNC ‘cremated the body’ before we could examine and test the [toxicity] of the DNC’s questionable claims. Based on the reports and the lawsuit, the DNC is expecting, without verification, for a jury and America to accept its narrative.”

The DNC sued Russia, President Trump, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange and others of working together to “undermine” Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign.

The suit names the Russian Federation; general staff of the armed forces of the Russian Federation; GRU Operative using pseudonym ‘Guccifer 2.0’; Aras Iskenerovich Agalarov; Emin Araz Agalarov; Joseph Mifsud; Wikileaks; Julian Assange; Donald J. Trump for President Inc.; Donald J. Trump Jr.; Paul J. Manafort Jr.; Roger J. Stone Jr.; Jared C. Kushner; George Papadopoulos; Richard W. Gates III; and John Does 1-10.”

It alleges violations of various statutes, including Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, RICO, RICO Conspiracy, Wiretap Act, Stored Communications Act, Digital Millennium Copyright Act, the Defend Trade Secrets Act, Uniform Trade Secrets Act, Trespass, conspiracy and Virginia Computer Crimes Act.

The DNC claims that in the Trump campaign, Russia “found a willing and active partner in this effort” to launch “a brazen attack on the 2016 election.”

The lawsuit seeks punitive and compensatory damages, charging the defendants won the 2016 election by illegal means.



Gun-control advocate assaults conservative student

(CAMPUS REFORM) — On April 20, 2018, Liberty Hangout, a right libertarian group at Kent State University, hosted a “change my mind” event on the K on the subject of gun rights. During the event, John Marcinkiewicz, a freshman political science major at Kent State, approached the group and assaulted their cameraman, Nathan Murphy.

According to Liberty Hangout, Marcinkiewicz approached the group around 3:15 p.m. and engaged them in conversation. Marcinkiewicz debated with the group for over thirteen minutes before crumpling up an informational paper he had been handed and striking the camera — a Canon Rebel T6i, priced at roughly $650 — out of Nathan Murphy’s hands.


14 states can’t guarantee accurate election results

(AXIOS) — Multiple states lack the ability to guarantee the accuracy of election outcomes in the event of a suspected breach.

The big picture: Five states — Louisiana, Georgia, South Carolina, New Jersey and Delaware — have no paper trails of votes. The other nine are in better shape, but still do not have all their counties’ machines spitting out a paper record.

The backstory: This is due to the direct recording electronic machines (DREs) these states use in some counties, which don’t cough up a paper copy of cast ballots.